Everything about Complementizer totally explained
A
complementizer, as used in
linguistics (especially
generative grammar), is a syntactic category (
part of speech) roughly equivalent to the term
subordinating conjunction in traditional grammar. For example, the word
that is generally called a complementizer in English sentences like
Mary believes that it's raining. The term "complementizer" was apparently first used by Rosenbaum (1967).
The standard abbreviation for
complementizer is
C. The complementizer is widely held to be the syntactic
head of a full
clause, which is therefore often represented by the abbreviation
CP (for
complementizer phrase). Evidence that the complementizer functions as the head of its clause includes the fact that it's commonly the last element in a clause in languages like
Korean or
Japanese, in which other heads follow their
complements, and always first in "head-initial" languages such as English.
It is common for the complementizers of a language to develop historically from other syntactic categories (a process known as
grammaticalization). Across the languages of the world, it's especially common for
determiners to be used as complementizers (for example, English
that). Another frequent source of complementizers is the class of
interrogative words. It is especially common for a form that otherwise means
what to be borrowed as a complementizer, but other interrogative words are often used as well; for example, colloquial English
I read in the paper how it's going to be cold today, with unstressed
how roughly equivalent to
that). English
for in sentences like
I would prefer for there to be a table in the corner shows a preposition that has arguably developed into a complementizer. (The sequence
for there in this sentence isn't a
prepositional phrase under this analysis.) In many languages of West Africa and South Asia, the form of the complementizer can be related to the verb
say. In these languages, the complementizer is also called the
quotative. The quotative performs many extended functions in these languages.
Empty complementizers
Some analyses allow for the possibility of invisible or "empty" complementizers. An empty complementizer is a hypothetical phonologically null category with a function parallel to that of visible complementizers such as
that and
for. Its existence in English has been proposed based on the following type of alternation:
» He hopes you go ahead with the speech
He hopes that you go ahead with the speech
Because
that can be inserted between the verb and the embedded clause, the original sentence without a visible complementizer would be reanalyzed as
» He hopes øC you go ahead with the speech
This suggests another interpretation of the earlier "how" sentence:
» I read in the paper øC [it'sgoing to be cold today]
where "how" serves as a specifier to the empty complementizer. This allows for a consistent analysis of another troublesome alternation:
» The man øC [Isaw yesterday] ate my lunch!
The man øC [Isaw yesterday] ate my lunch! » The man that [Isaw yesterday] ate my lunch!
where "OP" represents an invisible interrogative known as an
operator.
In a more general sense, the proposed empty complementizer parallels the suggestion of near-universal empty
determiners.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Complementizer'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://complementizer.totallyexplained.com">Complementizer Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |